Posts Tagged ‘plant amnesty’

Why Not to Hire a Tree Trimmer Who Wears Spikes

Thursday, May 21st, 2009

Yesterday I met with a new client in Seattle. As I walked up to his home, I immediately noticed three Cherry trees in the front parking strip had been topped recently. However, it wasn’t until I was reviewing the back garden that I saw the worst of the tree trimming horrors his garden had sustained. Not only had he hired a crew that was willing to top his trees, but they climbed a cypress in his backyard wearing climbing spikes, which damaged the bark and cambium layer of the tree terribly. When I saw the spiked trunk, at first I thought someone had hit the base of the tree with a car because so much of the lower bark had been torn off. I was wrong; it was the tree workers who did it.

So, why was this dismaying?

First, the living part of the tree is directly below the protective bark layer. This “cambium” layer is where the plant transports nutrients up and down the stem; the bark protects this area. As well, plants don’t heal. So every spike insertion becomes a site for pest and disease. The ripped and torn bark and holes in the cambium and older interior layers will never heal.

Second, the cuts that were made to top the cherries and to “shape” the other trees were made at random points on the stems creating a “shape” to the tree. This may sound just fine. But it isn’t. When you understand that trees do not heal and when you learn that plants have specific points in their growth systems where they can protect themselves from the cuts we make, you better understand how and where to make pruning cuts. Clearly, these trimmers don’t know this. Or, worse, they do know and they just don’t care. Or even worse than that, maybe they do know what they’re doing and they hope that their sloppy work will stimulate new growth (through topping the cherries) and cause decline (through wearing spikes in the cypress) thereby creating more work calls from the client to them in years to come.

Third, really, spike holes and topped trees are just plain ugly.

This Tree was Topped Twice!

This Tree was Topped Twice!

When hiring a tree trimming service, be sure to find out what certifications the service holds. Ideally, hire an ISA-certified, licensed arborist. If the service offers to top your trees, that’s your signal to run away immediately. If they climb using anything other than ropes, saddles and ladders, don’t let them near your tree. Those spikes will cause damage from which your tree may never recover. Just think: you’d be paying to have your trees — your investment in plants — destroyed rather than cared for.

As this client learned the hard way, just because a service is cheap and immediately available doesn’t mean they’re good. In his situation, they sold him on price and convenience saying he’d save a lot if he let them do the work that day because they “had a truck in the neighborhood”.  In the long run, this kind of work saves a homeowner nothing and quite often costs them much more down the road.

Looking for more information on proper pruning and where to find a certified arborist in your area? Find more information here:

  • Plant Amnesty: This organization was formed to teach people to stop topping trees and offers loads of information as well as a referal service for finding trained arborists.
  • ISA: The International Society of Arboriculture provides information on trees, tree care and certification of arborists around the world. This is your go-to spot to find an arborist anywhere on planet earth.
  • Garden Mentors: Interested in learning hands-on about how trees grow and how to prune them yourself? Or, just want to learn how trees should be pruned so you better understand how to hire and manage a tree trimming service? Get in touch for a hands-on garden coaching session now.
  • Share/Bookmark

Seattle Tree Ordinances Up For Review by City Council UPDATED 03/01/09

Friday, December 19th, 2008

03/01/09 update: Details from Councilperson Jean Godden on Seattle City Council Vote on the Street Tree Bill.

12/18/08 update: Written comments on proposed tree protections for the City of Seattle will be accepted until 1/16/09.

The Environment, Emergency Management, and Utilities Committee will accept written comments on proposed tree protections for the City of Seattle until January 16, 2009. The proposal would establish interim protections for a period of six months to a year while the Mayor and Department of Planning and Development complete the Urban Forest Management Plan to increase the tree canopy and stop the loss of healthy, mature trees. Written comments should be sent to richard.conlin@seattle.gov or

Councilmember Richard Conlin
Legislative Department
PO Box 34025
Seattle, WA 98124-4025

Copies of the proposal, Council Bill 116404, are available here or from the City Clerk’s Office, 600 4th Avenue, Floor 3, (206) 684-8344. The Clerk’s Office is open 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday.

_________________________________________________________________________

Original Post: The Seattle City Council is reviewing the Seattle Street Tree ordinance in the coming months. The new ordinance is considering the following:

  • Tree protection: The current ordinance does not have any provisions for tree protection. The new ordinance regulates the attachment of holiday lights, prohibits topping, spurring, and the attachment of any signs or objects. It also prohibits the placement of construction debris adjacent to the tree and regulates the storage of materials adjacent to right-of-way trees.
  • Permitting: The current ordinance requires the need for permits to plant, prune or remove a street tree. The new ordinance details the specifics of permit requirements, and allows SDOT to require replacement of trees that are removed. It also sets conditions by which permits are granted or denied.
  • Tree maintenance: The old ordinance does not include any language that indicates who is responsible for the maintenance of right-of-way trees. The new ordinance establishes the criteria by which the city assumes maintenance of a right-of-way tree, and gives the city authority to perform emergency work on trees that are deemed to be the maintenance responsibility of the abutting property owner. It also details a property owner’s maintenance responsibility and establishes the criteria by which a tree can be deemed a public nuisance. The new ordinance retains SDOT’s authority to order the maintenance of a right-of-way tree to ensure public safety in relation to overhead utilities or clearance over streets and sidewalks.
  • Arborist Certification: The old ordinance did not include any criteria by which tree care professionals were regulated. The new ordinance makes it illegal for anyone to perform work (for “valuable consideration”) on ROW trees unless the work is performed by or under the supervision of an ISA Certified Arborist – this includes Certified Tree Workers, Utility Specialists and Board Certified Master Arborists. The ordinance also establishes insurance requirements for tree care firms. It does not prevent a homeowner from performing work on trees adjacent to their property as long as the work meets industry standards.
  • Identifies other illegal activities related to the treatment of trees and clarifies authority to levy penalties for damaging or destroying trees. The penalties that are established include the recovery of the appraised value of the tree by the city.

If you would like to weigh in on these issues with the Seattle City Council, Plantamnesty.org makes it easy here. If you’ve ever wondered who should be pruning the tree in front of your house or why you tripped over the sidewalk that’s being heaved by the roots of an enormous tree, consider speaking up to ensure that these issues are properly managed in our city — to keep people and trees safe through proper planting and care practices.

  • Share/Bookmark