Posts Tagged ‘epa’

Hummingbirds and Water Features

Wednesday, August 6th, 2008
Hummingbird perched on waterfeature

Hummingbird perched on waterfeature

Throughout the year I’m blessed with hummingbirds in my garden. In the winter they feast on Garrya elliptica, Flowering Winter Currant and Witch Hazel. In fall they sip at Monkshood, Hardy Fuchsia and Pineapple Sage. In spring they snap up aphids and sip nectar from a smorgasborg of annuals and perennials. And in summer the bountiful feast includes Hot Lips Salvia, Penstemon, Bee Balm, Cleome and much more. Plus, in the height of summer these marvelous creatures visit my garden to sip from and bathe in the flowing water in my waterfeature’s bamboo spigot.

Hummingbird hovering over Waterfeature

Hummingbird hovering over Waterfeature

Anyone familiar with hummingbirds knows they’ll hover and toy with you, appearing whenever you are without a camera in the garden. They’ll watch you, buzz you and chirp away if they are accustomed to sharing the garden with you. If they aren’t accustomed to you, they may buzz and dive at you in a not-so-nice “get out of my territory” way.

Hummingbird washing in stream

Hummingbird washing in stream

Over the last several weeks my resident hummingbird has been in the garden feeding away. He seems to visit mostly in the morning and just before dusk, or maybe that’s just when I tend to see him out there. And, during several mornings I have found him sipping at the bamboo spigot. He is very accustomed to sharing the garden with me, and I swear we talk to each other. He chirps. I say, “good morning beautiful.” Today as he took his morning bath, he posed for the camera. Usually, he’s quite shy, but as you can see, he wasn’t this morning.

So, to those who would like us to believe that “…these water features serve no functional or practical purpose, their water use is not considered efficient.” (section 4.1.4). I propose they are functional and practical in ways beyond human purpose.

If you would like to comment back to the EPA on their suggestion in the Watersense program draft that waterfeatures are functionless and impractical, the comment period has been extended once again to September 4, 2008.

If you’re interested in building your own small water feature, check out a couple of installation diaries:

  • Share/Bookmark

EPA Proposes Ban on Water Features

Wednesday, July 16th, 2008

A friend just turned me on to a new proposal by the EPA to ban water features, or at least that’s how the headline came through on the blurb she sent me. As it turns out (or maybe I should say, “as it appears to me”), the EPA is proposing that ornamental water features will be disallowed under the EPA’s new “Water Sense”  designation program. This program provides standards for new home builders to meet. I’d liken it to the green building program standards. What the EPA is saying is that “…these water features serve no functional or practical purpose, their water use is not considered efficient.” (section 4.1.4).

My personal response is that water features provide purpose. plants_176_132_4.jpgThey provide a noise break in city areas where traffic noise is bothersome. They provide meditation points in the garden. In my own garden, my small, potted water feature provides a source of fresh, recirculating water for birds, bees and other insects that visit it daily. As well, it provides habitat for water plants. It does help us refocus our “sound attention” away from overhead airplane traffic and the buzz of nearby busy streets. IMHO: these are both functional and practical purposes. Plus, the water feature itself holds less than a bathtub full of water that recirculates, so very little water is used. And, as I’ve already pointed out, the water provides habitat and a watering source for wildlife. My aesthetic enjoyment of it is just one of its many positives.

Various organizations such as the International Professional Pond Contractors Association, I believe, are asking for revisions to the designation program to clarify that some systems be allowed under the program.

If you would like to share your thoughts with the EPA on this new standard, comments are being accepted until July 21, 2008.

More information on this proposal and links to comment are available at:

  • Share/Bookmark