Archive for the ‘Landscaping Regulations’ Category

For Peat’s Sake! Why Aren’t You Going Coconuts?

Tuesday, March 16th, 2010

My co-hort Olaf Ribiero, noted plant pathologist, arborist, author and saver-of-ancient-trees, sent me a note about the UK proposal to phase out peat in consumer-based compost materials by the year 2020. I had known that peat extraction was destroying the ancient peat bogs, but what I hadn’t realized was the impact peat extraction has on climate change. Apparently, over a half a million tons of CO2 is released into the atmosphere when peat is extracted. Then, the peat is shipped, piling on even more. Plus, the ancient bog habitats are disturbed. It is a nasty cycle.

Really, there’s no reason to wait for legislation to stop using peat. Instead, consider alternatives to products containing this natural resource. Coir mulches, potting mixes and pot liners are a much more renewable alternatives derived from coconut, and they’re available in the consumer market now – cheap. Next time you’re picking up a product, consider the long term impact your purchase may have. Read the label and tread lightly.

  • Share/Bookmark

Washington State Bill May End Up Taking the P out of Lawn Fertilizer NPK

Saturday, March 6th, 2010
Dandelions - a Lawn that Feeds and isn't Fed

Dandelions - a Lawn that Feeds and isn't Fed

Via email I received a report this morning from  Heather Hansen that Washington State Bill SB6289 died in the rules committee on Friday, March 5, 2010. This isn’t to say that future fertilization regulations won’t happen at some point, but don’t expect it any time soon. Read on for more in my original post on this proposed bill including a link to the bill history itself, which, by-the-way,  as of this morning is not reporting that the bill has died.

Original Post from January 27, 2010:

Yesterday I received an alert message from WSNLA lobbyist Heather Hansen regarding Washington State Bill SB6289’s status and potential impact on the landscape industry. The headline of the bill is “Protecting Lake Waters by Reducing Phosphorous from Lawn Fertilizers”.  And, as wording in the Bill itself states “Phosphorus loading of surface waters can stimulate the growth of weeds and algae and that this growth can have adverse environmental, health, and aesthetic effects;” (note: this is copy taken from one iteration of edits in the bill review process; this wording may change over time.).

Should this Bill become Law several specific changes may be forthcoming for lawn management companies according to Heather Hansen, WSNLA lobbyist including:

  • Dept. of Ecology gains authority over fertilizer rather than the Dept. of Agriculture. (sec. 2)
  • Different standards are set for solid and liquid fertilizer. (sec. 3)
  • Organic fertilizer is effectively banned (sec. 3)
  • Spills must be “immediately contained” — but enforcement and definition of these spills isn’t quite clear (sec. 4)

Having read through the copy of the bill Heather sent out, it seems that this bill will do nothing to limit fertilizer use by homeowners or limit fertilization for non-lawn use. I encourage you to read through the bill here and submit your feedback on it to the legislature. IMHO: while the idea of reducing lawn fertilizers is very necessary, this bill, as written,  needs some deeper refinement to make it effective and useful in protecting the environment and in protecting small business.

If you’re a Washington State Resident and wish to contact your legislators about this bill, you may look up their contact information here.

Read more about ecologically sound lawn care for the Pacific Northwest here.

Read more about Pollution Prevention in Landscaping here.

  • Share/Bookmark

EPA Has Extended the Comment Period for the WaterSense Program

Friday, August 1st, 2008

I was just informed that responding to written request initiated by the Irrigation Association and signed by a consortium of 55 green industry companies and associations, including ANLA, the EPA has decided to extend the comment period 45 days for the WasteSense program’s draft Water-Efficient Single Family New Home Specifications.

Word is, the WaterSense draft was developed by EPA to provide voluntary guidelines for water conservation for new home construction, including the outside landscape. And, apparently, the specifications were developed without relevant stakeholder input from the landscape and turf industries. Potentially, this will have a very negative effect on landscaping and water features in the landscape. Although WaterSense is a voluntary EPA program, the concern is the the program will evolve in such a way that many stats and local units of government will mandate WaterSense compliance in new construction.

Contact John Flowers at flowers.john@epa.gov, 202/564/0624 and watersense-newhomes@erg.com to express concerns regarding the draft. For more details on the program go to www.epa.gov/watersense

I expressed my opinions on this in an earlier post.

  • Share/Bookmark